Moreover, the condition of retaining inmates in prison, who may be innocent and deserve to be freed, or who may really deserve death judgment, is costly. What to do about the prevalence of plea bargaining.

Plea bargaining should be limited depending on the level of crime that an individual has committed. This is to avoid the ineffective delivery of justice to crime offenders and to the crime victims.

One disadvantage of plea bargaining, according to an online article is The concrete disadvantage is that there is some reduction in the conviction offense or sentence on both.

Plea bargaining also has advantages but only when it is applied on appropriate criminal cases. Therefore, in my stand, plea bargaining should not be totally abolished. Rather, it must be implemented on moderate cases of offense. The strategy is to set a

According to an online article,
Plea bargaining is also a method of delivering leniency where it is actually appropriate. The criminal justice system is notoriously lenient towards first offenders

Some of the law offenses where plea bargaining may apply are Crimes where no life has been greatly aggravated such as mild theft

Civil law offenses such as traffic violations

On the other hand, some of the law offenses where plea bargaining should definitely be abolished are Crimes where a life has been aggravated, such as homicide

Drug trafficking

Bibliography

Cooper, Claire. State's Chief Justice Sees Slow Improvement in Death Penalty System.

2004. Sacbee.Com Online. 2005. http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/crime/story/11772832p-12657662c.html

Silberblatt, Steven. The Problem with Plea Bargaining.

1998. BrooklynGoClub Online. 2005. http://brooklyngoclub.org/jc/coercion.html

Plea Bargaining. http://www.michiganprosecutor.org/alger/Articles/Plea%20Bargaining%20-%20March%202003.doc.